L'investissement dans la réduction des risques doit être inclus dans le mouvement pour la réduction des fonds de la police

PxHere - CC0

Actualités

L'investissement dans la réduction des risques doit être inclus dans le mouvement pour la réduction des fonds de la police

2 juillet 2020

Alors que les preuves que le maintien de l'ordre et la criminalisation des personnes qui consomment des drogues ne fonctionnent pas abondent, la nécessité de financer la réduction des risques n'a jamais été aussi évidente. Pour en savoir plus, en anglais, veuillez lire les informations ci-dessous.

By Jenavieve Hatch for HuffPost

When police respond to 911 calls about people experiencing homelessness or mental health crises, the results can be lethal. As protests against police brutality continue to grip the nation, cities are beginning to acknowledge that law enforcement isn’t well equipped to handle these cases.

Instead, there’s growing momentum not just for defunding police, but for investing in harm reduction practices — ones that don’t criminalize people experiencing homelessness or substance misuse, but approach these issues as public health matters that are best handled with communal resources.

San Francisco Mayor London Breed announced earlier this month that police will no longer be the first to respond to calls involving the homeless, mental health crises and conflicts among neighbors. Members of the Los Angeles City Council are pushing to do the same. House Democrats unveiled legislation aimed at not just curbing police brutality, but establishing a grant program “to help communities to re-imagine and develop concrete, just and equitable public safety approaches.” Implementing these policies would contribute to the work that harm reductionists have been doing with little support for over 30 years.