Méthamphétamine: faits vs. fiction et leçons tirées de l'hystérie du crack

Publications

Méthamphétamine: faits vs. fiction et leçons tirées de l'hystérie du crack

24 février 2014

Ce rapport souligne la stigmatisation des consommateurs et les réponses politiques dangereuses actuelles qui rappellent « l’hystérie du crack » des années 80 et 90.

Pour en savoir plus, veuillez lire les informations ci-dessous (en anglais).

Abonnez-vous à l'Alerte mensuelle de l'IDPC pour recevoir des informations relatives à la politique des drogues.

The rise in methamphetamine use has provoked a barrage of misinformation and reckless policies, such as mandatory minimum sentences, increased penalties for minor offenders and major restrictions against certain medicines.

This new report, titled Methamphetamine: Fact vs. Fiction and Lessons from the Crack Hysteria, reveals the extreme stigmatization of users and dangerous policy responses that are reminiscent of the crack hysteria in the 1980s and 1990s, which led to grossly misguided laws that accelerated mass incarceration in the United States.

The report recommends that national and international policymakers review laws that harshly punish methamphetamine possession or use, invest in treatment rather than punishment, restudy the restriction of access to amphetamines for legitimate medical purposes, and stop supporting wasteful and ineffective campaigns of misinformation on methamphetamine use.

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

Profils associés

  • Open Society Foundations (OSF)

Traductions