This note provides an overview of human rights and international law concerns raised by the 2011 Annual Report of the International Narcotics Control Board. These include questionable legal reasoning by the Board; the absence of broader human rights norms; problematic statements on specific issues; unqualified comments and support for policies despite human rights risks; and stigmatising language unbecoming a UN entity. These are patterns that are evident in previous Annual Reports.

Article 9 of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs states that ‘Members of the Board shall be persons who, by their competence, impartiality and disinterestedness, will command general confidence’. The 2011 Annual Report of the INCB shows that, as an entity, the Board is failing to live up to the standards to which all members should be held under the terms of the 1961 Single Convention. It is time to ask whether the INCB, without basic reforms, can continue to ‘command general confidence’.

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.