Offender diversion into substance use disorder treatment: The economic impact of California’s proposition 36

The objetives of this research are to determine the costs and savings attributable to the California Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act (SACPA), which mandated probation or continued parole with substance abuse treatment in lieu of incarceration for adult offenders convicted of nonviolent drug offenses and probation and parole violators.

The researchers used individually linked, population-level administrative data to define intervention and control cohorts of offenders meeting SACPA eligibility criteria. Their results show that the additional costs of treatment were more than offset by savings in other domains, primarily in the costs of incarceration. We estimated the statewide policy effect as an adjusted savings of $2317 (95% confidence interval = $1905, $2730) per offender over a 30-month postconviction period. SACPA implementation resulted in greater incremental cost savings for Blacks and Hispanics, who had markedly higher rates of conviction and incarceration.

Read here the full publication (restricted access)

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.