By Coletta Youngers, IDPC and WOLA
Although Ecuador is not a major drug-producing or consuming country, Ecuadoreans have suffered one of the hemisphere’s harshest drug laws. The 1991 Law on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, better known as Law 108, was passed at a time when U.S. pressure to fall into line with the repressive approach mandated by international drug control conventions was overwhelming. Law 108 has sentences that are disproportionate to sanctions for other crimes. The law also contradicts due process guarantees and violates the accused’s constitutional rights.
Law 108 does not distinguish the drug in question, the quantity of drug involved, or whether an alleged crime is violent or non-violent. All of those convicted of a trafficking offense are subjected to the same severe mandatory minimums of 12 years in prison. Furthermore, a drug trafficker can be indicted in multiple categories—for example, possession and transport—and thus the sentences can sum up to a maximum of 25 years. As the minimum sentence for homicide is 16 years, someone convicted for a low-level drug offense, like small-scale dealing, can end up with a higher sentence than a murderer.
The law’s success was measured by how many individuals were jailed. This resulted in major overcrowding and a significant worsening of prison conditions; the incarcerated population more than doubled in slightly less than two decades. By 2007, the percentage of persons in prison vs. those for which the prison system was built stood at 157%. Eighteen thousand people were detained in an infrastructure built to hold 7,000 inmates, resulting in the worst overcrowding in Latin America. In urban areas as many as 45% of imprisoned men are there on drug charges; for women, it reaches 80%.
Faced with this deteriorating situation, a task force established by the National Constituent Assembly (2007-2008) convened to review prisons and the penal code witnessed first-hand the appalling overcrowding, inhumane conditions, and the high percentage of prisoners incarcerated under Law 108. They approved a national pardon in late 2008 to cover everyone in prison for the trafficking or possession of illegal substances who met the following criteria: the prisoner had been sentenced, it was a first-time offense, the illegal substance involved was two kilograms or less, and the inmate had fulfilled at least 10% (or a minimum of a year) of the judgment. “This historic step…has helped to reduce some of prison overcrowding,” explained Domingo Paredes, former head of the country’s drug agency, CONSEP, in Cocaine Unwrapped. “The pardon had not only a humanitarian purpose, but a social one as well, because these imprisoned people had a one-time opportunity to re-insert themselves in society.”
Once the Constituent Assembly approved the pardon, 2,300 people were released, according to the Ecuadoran Public Defender’s Office. As of March 2010, the recidivism rate was under 1%. “The pardon didn’t reward us for being criminals,” says former drug mule Nelsy in Cocaine Unwrapped. “It just recognized that we are human beings who made a mistake.”
The pardon was intended as a stop-gap while Law 108 was reformulated; however, it would be years before that happened and eventually the prison population shot right back up. It was not until 2013 that the National Assembly considered a revised penal code, presently being implemented, which incorporates drug crimes and replaces Law 108. That law mitigates significantly the disproportionality of Law 108, with sentences as low as two to six months for small-scale trafficking.
Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.