Legal amendments that make cannabis smokers 

 if a neighbour reports them and claims they can smell the drug, have infuriated two NGOs.

"The new cannabis amendments demonstrate a government that has lost all sense of direction and is now a hostage to the cannabinoid industry," ReLeaf Malta and Moviment Graffitti said in a statement on Sunday.

"The violation of privacy and anonymity reduces personal rights and gives fresh impetus to a culture of stigma against thousands of cannabis consumers and cultivators in Malta and Gozo," they added.

The new, stricter regulations against people who smoke and cultivate cannabis were approved by parliament earlier this month.

Malta: NGOs infuriated by new regulations on cannabis smoke that annoys neighbours

La siguiente es una crónica sobre el cannabis en México a partir del siglo XXI, precedida por algunos antecedentes de contexto.

México es un país cuya formalidad -legal, política- raramente coincide con lo que sucede en la realidad del mercado o en la relación cotidiana del ciudadano con la ley; y la cannabis es un buen ejemplo de ello.

 llegó por primera vez a lo que ahora es México con los conquistadores españoles, para ser utilizada como cáñamo, a finales del siglo XV.

Debido en buena medida a la sofisticada relación de los pueblos originales con el mundo natural, así como a sus amplios conocimientos botánicos, la planta pronto fue adoptada –y utilizada– también por sus efectos psicoactivos, incorporándose a la cultura popular.

Muy pronto, también, esas prácticas fueron notadas y reprobados por la Iglesia católica, si bien las propias autoridades virreinales también impulsaron el cultivo del cáñamo, por lo que durante los siguientes siglos la mariguana no desapareció de la cultura popular, pero el 

 psicoactivo fue un asunto confinado únicamente a los segmentos más pobres de la sociedad, del submundo criminal, o de algunos artistas díscolos.

La Revolución Mexicana de (1910-1920) tuvo como resultado un sistema presidencialista y de partido hegemónico –el Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) que mantuvo relativamente pacífico al país hasta fines del Siglo XX, pero con libertades civiles limitadas en los hechos.

, antes incluso que en los Estados Unidos, y si bien el régimen conoció, toleró y gestionó siempre el tráfico y su comercio local, nunca fue asunto de debate público o de interés político.

A pesar de ello, el Dr. Leopoldo Salazar Viniegra, entonces Jefe del Hospital Psiquiátrico y el mayor especialista nacional en toxicomanía, logró la despenalización de todas las drogas -

 incluida- durante 5 meses de 1940, con el argumento de que la prohibición dificultaba los esfuerzos nacionales en materia de salud pública. Previsiblemente, el experimento fue cancelado por presiones de Estados Unidos.

Después de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, y de la firma y ratificación de México a la Convención Única de Estupefacientes de 1961, así como los dos tratados posteriores sobre sustancias psicoactivas de 1971 y 1988, la 

 se inscribió en los artículos 234, 235, 235 bis y 238, 237 y 238 del apartado “Estupefacientes”, en la Ley General de Salud de 1984.

En ellos se establece la prohibición absoluta del 

 en todas sus formas, el cáñamo incluido: “

Siembra, cultivo, cosecha, elaboración, preparación, acondicionamiento, adquisición, posesión, comercio, transporte en cualquier forma, prescripción médica, suministro, empleo, uso, consumo y, en general, todo acto relacionado con estupefacientes o con cualquier producto que los contenga

Para fines del Siglo 20 el sistema político del país se agotaba. Obligado por las circunstancias, el partido hegemónico debió tolerar reformas democráticas que ampliaron paulatinamente el espacio de la oposición política, pero también el de la sociedad civil. Causas antes consideradas como extrañas a la sociedad mexicana, como los derechos de ciertas minorías, comenzaron a ver la luz pública. La 

La ventana que se cierra: crónica política y legal de la cannabis en el México del Siglo XXI

The Netherlands expanded a government-run initiative on Monday allowing legal cannabis sales.

While growing cannabis is still illegal, cannabis shops — known as coffeeshops — in 10 municipalities will be allowed to sell marijuana from 10 licensed producers.

“Weed was sold here legally for 50 years, but the production was never legal. So it’s finally time to end that crazy, unexplainable situation and make it a legal professional sector,” Rick Bakker, commercial director at Hollandse Hoogtes, one of the regulated producers, told The Associated Press.

Some 80 coffeeshops are taking part in the experiment which advocates hope this will ultimately end a long-standing legal anomaly — you can buy and sell small amounts of weed without fear of prosecution in the Netherlands, but growing it commercially remains illegal.

Bakker's company in Bemmel, near the German border, is indistinguishable from the surrounding greenhouses producing tomatoes and peppers. But it makes 200 kilograms (440 pounds) of weed per week and is one of the largest producers in the experiment.

A trailblazer in decriminalizing pot since the 1970s, the Netherlands has grown more conservative. 

, long a magnet for marijuana smokers, has been closing coffeeshops in recent years and has banned smoking weed on some of the cobbled streets that make up its historic center.

Advocates have been pushing for a legal growing for years, citing the safety of the product as well as concerns about crime.

Dutch cannabis growers welcome expansion of state-run experiment to make sales legal

In July 2022, the Supreme Court of Ghana ruled in a 4-3 majority decision that the inclusion of Section 43 in the Act was unconstitutional, citing procedural flaws in its passage. However, experts believe that the successful implementation of these cannabis regulations could unlock significant economic benefits for Ghana.

The Minister for Finance, Hon. Ato Forson has revealed that the Ministry of the Interior has initiated processes to implement Section 43 of the Narcotics Control Commission Act, 2020 (Act 1019) and the Narcotics Control Commission Regulation 2023 (L.I. 2475).

He announced this in his presentation of the 2025 Budget Statement to Parliament on March 11, 2025.

Hon. Ato Forson stated that this initiative is aimed at regulating the cultivation and management of cannabis with a tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content not exceeding 0.3% on a dry weight basis in Ghana.

According to the Minister, Comprehensive Guidelines for the cultivation and management of cannabis have already been drafted, and the associated charges and fees will be laid before Parliament for approval in 2025. This is contained paragraph 734, page 119 of the THE 2025 BUDGET STATEMENT AND ECONOMIC POLICY OF GOVERNMENT referred to as 

“Resetting The Economy For The Ghana We Want”.

This development comes after years of legal back-and-forth regarding cannabis legislation in Ghana. The passage of Act 1019 in 2020 was initially celebrated as a progressive move toward the regulation of industrial hemp and medicinal cannabis. However, in July 2022, the Supreme Court of Ghana ruled in a 4-3 majority decision that the inclusion of Section 43 in the Act was unconstitutional, citing procedural flaws in its passage.

Following a review application by the Attorney General, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its decision in May 2023, maintaining that the legislative process leading to the law's approval was flawed. This ruling temporarily halted efforts to regulate the cultivation and management of industrial hemp in Ghana. This necessitated Parliament to reconvene and pass amendment of the Act to let same be inline with the parameters set by the Supreme Court.

The decision to finalize regulatory guidelines and present them before Parliament for approval signals a renewed push toward creating a structured legal framework for industrial hemp cultivation.

Ghana: Government to lay guidelines for cultivation and management of cannabis for approval in 2025

This report evaluates the economic impacts of legalising and regulating cannabis for adult non-medical use in the UK from a Treasury perspective of income and spending. The report focuses on government revenues (corporation and income tax, VAT, National Insurance, licensing fees, and, in the scenario of a state monopoly model, profits), savings across the criminal justice system (CJS) from reduced costs on enforcement, and the costs of administering a regulatory model.

For Transform, economic arguments for cannabis, though significant, are secondary to public health and social justice policy priorities. But the economic dimensions of the cannabis reform debate are undoubtedly gaining
political salience, particularly as governments face growing budgetary pressures. Public support for cannabis reform, particularly for economic reasons, such as disrupting illegal profits and the potential tax income, is growing in both the U.S. and the UK.

This report analyses three different regulatory scenarios:

1. Home-grow provision for personal use, and non-profit membership-based associations, with no commercial retail

2. Hybrid model including home grow, non-profit associations and regulated commercial retail

3. A Hybrid model Home grow, non-profit associations, and commercial retail operating under a state monopoly (profits on retail sale accrue to the state)


High returns: The economic benefits of UK cannabis legalisation

A recent study suggests the ACT's cannabis legislation is mostly working as intended, but shows the majority of cannabis cultivators are engaging in illegal activity in order to grow it.

growing, possession and use of small amounts of cannabis was legalised in the ACT.

The research, conducted by the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics based at the University of Sydney, indicated the five-year-old laws are having the intended effect.

Academic Director of the Lambert Initiative, Iain McGregor, said the legislation had "been a real positive for cultivators".

Nearly three years after the legislation was introduced, 311 people who grew cannabis were asked a series of questions.

Some respondents also sent samples of their cannabis for chemical analysis, including the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol — the chemical that produces a high — in them.

Australia: Canberra cultivators mainly grow 'mild and modest' cannabis, study finds

This article examines narratives of cannabis legalization in Nigeria. While most existing research on cannabis legalization has concentrated on the global North, we focus on one of Africa's largest cannabis markets, as well as the views of actors heavily criminalized and excluded from policy debates. Based on in-depth interviews and long-time engagement with illicit cannabis farmers and traders, the article highlights the contestations in their hidden narratives, troubling extant views of cannabis legalization which uncritically laud its socioeconomic benefits, and revealing the potential downsides of legalization in the context of an exploitative legal neo-liberal economy rife with social inequities. The findings of this study also highlight a need for open policy debate that engages criminalized cannabis producing communities who have borne the brunt of both prohibition and economic marginalization to chart the way forward for more inclusive and meaningful cannabis policy reform.

Contesting cannabis legalization in Nigeria: Hidden narratives of illicit farmers and traders

In Golba Hill on the Caribbean island of 

 (SVG), just below a cluster of colourfully decorated homes, there are rows and rows of premium marijuana plants. Gleaming like green gold in the Caribbean sun, they lead up to a crudely constructed hut where cannabis farmer Bobbis Matthews spends most of his time nurturing and protecting his precious field.

As he did his routine inspection, removing male plants that could diminish the potency of his crop, Matthews recalled a time, not too long ago, when the idea of a cannabis farm in a residential area was unthinkable.

Like many of SVG’s cannabis farmers, Matthews is a Rastafarian who spent years hiding illegal cannabis fields deep in the mountains and living in fear of US-backed antinarcotics operations that would destroy millions of dollars worth of the plant.

“It was hard! At least three times a year, US helicopters would come and tear down the crop. In those days, it felt like you couldn’t even say the word marijuana because just to say marijuana, you could get arrested,” Matthews said.

The Rastafarians opening up Caribbean cannabis farms to build a flourishing medical industry

What would the consequences of the potential cocaine and cannabis regulation in Rio de Janeiro be? This report dives into analyzing these potential impacts in a city long plagued by violence linked to drug trafficking and social inequality. With the recent decriminalization of cannabis possession in June 2024, this study explores whether broader drug regulation can reduce violence, dismantle organized crime, and alleviate mass incarceration in the favelas.

After the war on drugs: The impacts of cocaine and cannabis regulation in Rio de Janeiro

The Expert Seminar on Cannabis Regulation aimed to address the evolving landscape of cannabis regulation within the European Union and its intersection with international drug control treaties. Organized by the Transnational Institute (TNI) and co-sponsored by the Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA) and the Global Drugs Policy Observatory (GDPO), the seminar gathered policy and legal experts from six European countries engaged in various forms of cannabis regulation, five of which are EU member states (Czechia, Germany, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands) and one non-EU country (Switzerland). Also present were experts from the United States of America, where cannabis regulation is in full swing in states and discussed at the federal level, as well as other international policy experts and scholars in international law. Over the course of two days, the participants discussed the current state of cannabis regulation, legal tensions, and future scenarios for policy development.

Cannabis regulation, EU drug law, trade rules and the UN drug control treaties

Join us for the Geneva Course on Drug Policy, Health, and Diplomacy from January 27-30, 2025! Co-organized by the Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, the Global Health Center of the Geneva Graduate Institute, and the Global Commission on Drug Policy.

Participate in person in Geneva or online. Scholarships available!

Drug control, public health, harm reduction, and human rights

Current issues with cannabis, the opioid epidemic, and access to controlled medicines

Perspectives on drug policy reform in today's global diplomatic context

Join us and be part of the discussion! For more info and to apply, contact Kamila Guseinova at kamila.guseinova[@]unige.ch

Don’t miss this opportunity to engage with critical global drug policy issues!

Geneva course on drug policy, public health, and diplomacy

Thailand will regulate cannabis for medicinal use instead of re-listing the plant as a narcotic, the deputy prime minister said on Tuesday, in the government's U-turn on its previous policy.

Prime minister Srettha Thavisin had vowed to make cannabis illegal by the end of 2024, just two years after Thailand became one of the first countries in Asia to decriminalise marijuana.

Cannabis & related