The INCB’s intervention was an overwhelmingly positive one, promoting better access to controlled medicines, as well as an end to the application of the death penalty and extrajudicial killings in the name of drug control.

The INCB's intransigent position on cannabis is a mixed opportunity to foster dialogue about the increasing reality of legal regulation.

The INCB Watch is running a short series of posts to explore how the Board has changed – or remained the same – over the past decade or so. This post gives an overview of the areas we will analyse in the course of this project.

IDPC analyses the latest alerts published by the INCB on human rights & drug policy, long term opioid usage, tramadol, and the internet drug trade.

It remains to be seen how debates over cannabis develop and whether the meetings between the INCB and its civil society interlocutors grow into real processes of dialogue. But this is certainly a step in the right direction for the Board.

Adapting the UN drug control system to modern realities is long overdue, and if the Board wants to protect the useful elements of the current system, the only option is to facilitate change, through honest discussion and valid guidance.

The INCB has a duty to ensure its contribution to debates on drug control remains balanced and rigorous.

The INCB has a duty to ensure its contribution to debates on drug control remains balanced and rigorous.

The INCB strongly urges Governments to adopt humane and balanced drug policies that reflect a human rights-based approach.