Two significant submissions to the Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform were made last month, one by John Carnevale and the second by Peter Reuter and Jonathan Caulkins. Both submissions provide damning assessments of the performance of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (the White House office which oversees the US national drug strategy) over the last 8 years, with Carnevale calling for more balanced and evidence-driven policies, and Reuter & Caulkins critical of the resort to mass imprisonment and the failure to differentiate between the harm profiles of various drugs.
- Experts question data behind Indonesian president's war on drugs
- Standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners are being updated after 60 years
- Kofi Annan calls on the World Health Assembly to legally regulate drugs
- The death penalty for drug offences: ‘Asian values’ or drug treaty influence?
- Largest U.S. needle exchange tries free meth pipes in Seattle
- Imagine you are a judge: Ayahuasca in the courtroom
- The real UN debate around the war on drugs and the war on youth
- NGOs highlight human rights violations committed in the name of drug control
- The battle for harm reduction continues in Budapest